1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee
report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 Physical activity guidelines for Americans.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The association between school-based physical
activity, including physical education, and academic performance. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services; 2010.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States,
2011. MMWR 2012; 61(No. SS-4): 35–38.
5. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report Subcommittee of the President’s
Council on Fitness, Sports & Nutrition. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse
Report: Strategies to Increase Physical Activity Among Youth. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, 2012.
6. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Projections of Education
Statistics to 2011,NCES 2001–083, by Debra E. Gerald and William J. Hussar. Washington, DC:
2001.
7. Lee SM, Burgeson CR, Fulton JE, Spain CG. Physical education and physical activity: results from
the School Health Policies and Programs study 2006. J Sch Health 2007;77:435–63.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School health guidelines to promote healthy eating
and physical activity. MMWR 2011;60(No. RR-5):28–33.
9. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Comprehensive school physical
activity programs. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2008.
Available at www.aahperd.org/naspe/standards/upload/Comprehensive-School-Physical-ActivityPrograms2-2008.pdf
10. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Physical education is critical to a complete
education. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2001. Available
at www.aahperd.org/naspe/standards/upload/Physical-Education-is-Critical-to-a-CompleteEducation-2001.pdf
11. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical
activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4 Suppl):73–107.
12. Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Contribution of school programmes to physical activity levels and attitudes
in children and adults. Sports medicine. 2005;35(2):89–105.
13. Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, et al. Effect of schoolbased interventions on physical activity and
fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. British Journal of
Sport Med. 2011;45(11):923–30.
14. van Sluijs EM, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in
children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. Brit Med J. 2007;335(7622):703.
15. National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Moving into the future: national standards
for physical education, 2nd ed. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education;
2004.
66
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PROGRAMS: A GUIDE FOR SCHOOLS
16. Mahar MT, Murphy SK, Rowe DA, Golden J, Shields A, Raedeke TD. Effects of a classroom-based
program on physical activity and on-task behavior. Med Sci Sport Exer 2006;38:2086–94.
17. Stewart JA, Dennison DA, Kohl HW, Doyle JA. Exercise level and energy expenditure in the TAKE 10!
in-class physical activity program. J Sch Health 2004;74:397–400.
18. Donnelly JE, Lambourne K. Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic
achievement. Prev Med. 2011;52 Suppl 1: S36–42.
19. Erwin HE, Beighle A, Morgan CF, Noland M. Effect of a low-cost, teacher-directed classroom
intervention on elementary students’ physical activity. J Sch Health. 2011;81(8):455–61.
20. Chaddock L, Pontifex MB, Hillman CH, Kramer AF. A review of the relation of aerobic fitness
and physical activity to brain structure and function in children. J Int Neuropsychol Soc.
2011;17(6):975–85.
21. Aldana SG. Financial impact of health promotion programs: a review of the literature. Am J Health
Promot 2001;15:296–320.
22. Davis L, Loyo K, Glowka A, et al. A comprehensive worksite wellness program in Austin, Texas:
partnership between Steps to a Healthier Austin and Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6:A60.
23. Osilla KC, Van Busum K, Schnyer C, Larkin JW, Eibner C, Mattke S. Systematic review of the impact
of worksite wellness programs. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(2):e68–81.
24. Allegrante JP, Michela JL. Impact of a school-based workplace health promotion program on morale
of inner-city teachers. J Sch Health 1990;60:25–8.
25. Cullen KW, Baranowski T, Herbert D, deMoor C, Hearn MD, Resnicow K. Influence of school
organizational characteristics on the outcomes of a school health promotion program. J Sch Health
1999;69:376–80.
26. Galaif ER, Sussman S, Bundek N. The relations of school staff smokers’ attitudes about modeling
smoking behavior in students and their receptivity to no-smoking policy. J Drug Educ 1996;26:313–
22.
27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parent engagement: strategies for involving parents in
school health. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
28. Lee SM, Nihiser A, Strouse D, Das B, Michael S, Huhman M. Correlates of children and parents
being physically active together. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7:776–783.
29. Castelli D. The physical education teacher as school activity director: physical educators’
knowledge and training qualify them to play a leading role in promoting school wellness. (Stepping
up to the plate: physical educators as advocates for wellness policies—Part 1). J Phys Educ Rec
Dance. May 1 2007.
30. Pangrazi R, Beighle A, Pangrazi D. Promoting physical activity and health in the classroom. Pearson
Education, Inc. San Francisco: CA 2009.
31. Chen HT. Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation, and
effectiveness. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. 2005.
32. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd Ed). Sage Publications:
Thousand Oaks, CA. 1997.
67
REFERENCES
33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health.
Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 1999;48 (No. RR–11). Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/eval/
framework/index.htm
34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009a). Brief 14: Data collection methods for
program evaluation: Questionnaires. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/
data.htm
35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009b). Brief 17: Data collection methods for
program evaluation: Interviews. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/data.htm
36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009c). Brief 13: Data collection methods for
program evaluation: Focus groups. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/data.
htm
37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009d). Brief 18: Data collection methods for
program evaluation: Document review. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/
data.htm
38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009e). Brief 16: Data collection methods for
program evaluation: Observation. Available at
http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/data.
htm
